West Coast Baptist College: Typical Deception


Let me use Pauly Chappell as a perfect example of someone who acts like he takes a strong stand on the King James Bible, but actually he rejects the King James.

“We are committed to the King James Version of the Bible. We believe that God not only inspired every word of Scripture, but that He has preserved it through the ages (Psalm 12:6–7). We believe the KJV is the preserved Word of God for English-speaking people.”

Let us break down these comments.

-We are committed to the King James Version of the Bible.  

Look at this deceptive wording.  Notice the word “committed”.  That can mean anything and is a key word to identify that someone is trying to deceive you.  If you WANT to believe that fundies like WCBC are Bible Believers, this will be sufficient for you.  But remember, “committed to” is not the same as “believe”.

-We believe that God not only inspired every word of Scripture, but that He has preserved it through the ages (Psalm 12:6–7).

Again, that wording allows them “plausible deniability” so use a modern term.  It allows them to seem strong on the Bible issue, meanwhile they promote the typical Alexandrian attitude towards the Bible.  They know that what they believe is that the Textus Receptus is inspired (no comment on the OT or which version of the TR they believe).  Read the book on the Bible version issue by Oulette that is endorsed by Chappell.  They reject the inspiration of the King James.

-We believe the KJV is the preserved Word of God for English-speaking people.

What is not said? There is nothing about final authority.  What about Bilingual people?  What about where the King James Bible and a Spanish or German Bible contradict?  These are the questions that matter and they are not addressed by WCBC.

This is sadly typical of what I call “lowest common denominator” Christianity.  Chappell makes a million dollars a year taking church building strategies from Rick Warren and repackaging them under the guise of Independent Baptist and King James Only.  They are NOT Bible Believers.  Anyone paying attention to their words should be able to figure that out.


Quadruple Inspiration

A lot of dumb Fundamentalists get all worked up in a tizzy over what they have decided to call “Double Inspiration”.  Many fundamentalist preachers like to talk about how they believe the King James Bible, but they claim to not believe that it is “inspired” because that would be “Double Inspiration.”  What a true Bible Believer believes is QUADRUPLE inspiration.  I want to make this clear in this blog post today.

If you want to find out the difference between a Bible Believer and a Fundamentalist, ask them if the King James Bible is inspired.  All fundamentalists will back down.  A Bible Believer believes that the King James Bible fulfills II Tim 3:16, “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:”  He believes that the King James is “given by inspiration”.  Is the King James Bible Scripture?  If yes, then it’s given by inspiration.  If no, then you are not a Bible Believer.  You are just another Fundy.  Case Closed.

The modern Fundy believes the equation look like this:



They would argue something along the lines of: No translation can be inspired.  But this will not hold up.  The original manuscripts are filled with inspired translation.  This would include Moses and Pharaoh’s conversations (who would argue that Pharaoh spoke the language of the slaves?) and New Testament Greek quotations of the Old Testament Hebrew.

Modern Funnymentalists believe that only a heretic would believe in Double Inspiration.  They believe the equation would be this:

ORIGINAL WRITINGS =  Single Inspired

KING JAMES BIBLE = Double Inspired

But a good way to shock the Bible rejecting Fundy would be to give the equation as it stands in the Bible.  The equation, with scripture, could be set up like this:

SPOKEN ORIGINAL: Jeremiah 36:4, what came out of Jeremiah’s mouth is the “words of the Lord” see I Peter 1:21

ORIGINAL WRITINGS: Jeremiah 36:4  Baruch wrote down the “words of the Lord”.  These writings are destroyed or lost in Jeremiah 36:23.

SECOND ORIGINAL WRITINGS: Jeremiah 36:23 There is another original.  Notice how these second originals are better than the first.  This fits Psalm 12:6,7.

KING JAMES BIBLE:  A fourth inspiration.

One could  possible fine one or two more inspiration in Jeremiah 51, but four is shocking enough if you are used to thinking that two is too much…

I have not gone into all the ins and outs of the argument here, but I wanted to lay out an example of Quadruple Inspiration.  Needless to say, that if a man rejects so called “double inspiration” then he rejects Christ when he says in Matt 24:35, “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”  He believes that the first writings passed away.  Don’t be so foolish to reject “double inspiration” without looking up what the Bible says on the subject.

Why the King James Bible is Better than the Originals

Why the King James Bible is better than the originals

Jer 36 – Originals destroyed, but then God made copy that was better (vs. 32).

  1. It exists. (Ecc 9:4)
    1. Multiple copies. Only one original.
  2. All books together.
    1. No complete Greek Bible until after 200 AD. No Hebrew until 1599 AD.
  3. Universal Language.
    1. No one speak Koine Greek, so you’re at the mercy of lexicons.
  4. Spaces between words, punctuation, lower case.
    1. Originals written in scriptio continua. Ex: oppurtinityisnowhere.
  5. Chapters, Verse, Paragraphs.
    1. Chapters added in 1205 by Stephen Langton
    2. Verses added in OT by Rabbi Nathan Kalonymus in 1440.
    3. Verses added in NT by Robert Estienne (Stephanus) in 1551.
  6. Millions saved reading King James.
  7. Philadelphia church period given credit for having “kept my word” (Rev 3:8)
    1. This period typically dated from 1500-1900.
  8. Premillennial Order.
    1. Ex: 2 Chron (Jew told to go back to land-1917), Ezra (Jews actually return-1940s), Nehemiah (Jew rebuild in the land- 1950 to present), Esther (Gentile bride dumped for Jewish bride- happens at Rapture), Job (type of Tribulation), Psalm (chapter 2- the King comes).

Why God picked English

There must be a final authority. Deut 25:13-16

  • Must be Protestant
    • Spain and France had their chance.
  • Worldwide
    • 1.2 Billion English speakers.
    • 2 Billion by 2030.
    • 50% of European Union, 85% of Israel.
  • Must be connected to a King. (Ecc 8:4)
    • Antichrist has mouth like lion.  Lion connected to England. (Rev 13:2)
  • England connected to absolutes.
    • Time- Greenwich Mean Time.
    • Location – Longitude measured from Prime meridian in Greenwich, UK.
  • Miscellaneous language characteristics.
    • No throaty sounds. Better for street preaching.
    • Etc, etc, etc…

A Critique of George Lujack’s Critique of the King James Only Position

I truly enjoy critiquing other people’s critiques.  I probably enjoy it a little too much.  Gott hilf mir.

Today we will look at a paper by George Lujack.  This man is a New Yorker, who follows Messianic Judaism although he does not go so far as to reject the Apostle Paul.  Given enough time, either he or most of his followers will get there as that is the logical terminus of Hebrew Roots doctrine.

The guy seems like a prolific author and some of his articles are somewhat decent.  However, on many topics he should just keep quite.  Because when he tries to comment, he makes himself look dumb.

For an example of this, we shall look at his article about the King James issue.  It can be found here:


We shall make our comments in BOLD.

By George Lujack
Some Christians believe in the inerrancy and infallibility of the King James Bible as the pure -perfect – preserved word of God for the English-speaking people. ME, I DO. This article will discuss the origins of the King James Bible Only doctrine, present irrefutable proofs that the King James Bible is not perfectly translated into English, and will declare the King James Bible Only doctrine to be false.

Many persons since the early 1600’s have proclaimed that the English people must read the King James Version Bible ONLY, being that it is the inspired, perfect, preserved, pure word of God for the English-speaking people, and all other English translations are inaccurate and / or inferior. This doctrinal belief originated from King James himself.  NICE THAT YOU DIDN’T TRY THE USUAL ROUTE WHERE CRITICS CLAIM THAT DOCTOR RUCKMAN OR 7TH DAY ADVENTISTS INVENTED IT.  I WOULD TEND TO AGREE WITH HIM HERE.  Bishops of the Church of England, under orders of King James, exercising ‘ecclesiastical authority and jurisdiction’ wrote many articles and promoted the distribution and placement of the Authorized Version of the King James Bible in the English churches and elsewhere. It was King James, through the Church of England, who first introduced the concept that the King James Bible translators were inspired by God and that only the Authorized Version King James Bible was inerrant and infallible [1]. I GUESS THE QUESTION WOULD BE: CAN THEY PROVE IT THEN?

2 TIMOTHY 3:16: All Scripture is given by inspiration of God…IT WOULD BE INTERESTING IF HE GAVE THE WHOLE CONTEXT HERE…
The Scriptures, given to us in their original Hebrew and Greek languages, are the inspired word of God. CHAPTER AND VERSE?  I THINK THEY ARE INSPIRED, THE QUESTION IS: WAS ANYTHING ELSE GIVEN BY INSPIRATION? The King James Bible is not the original written Scriptures TRUE and was not given to us by the inspiration of God, NOT PROVEN but is a translation of His given inspired word to the English language TRANSLATIONS CAN BE INSPIRED.  LOOK AT ALL THE OT QUOTES IN THE NT. God directly inspired the prophets and apostles to write the Scriptures. King James commissioned translators to translate the Scriptures into English. OK, SO THEY DIDN’T KNOW THEY WERE INSPIRED, NEITHER DID PAUL I COR 7:12
There are many Christian ministers who believe that archaic old English is a more godly language than modern English. THAT IS A MATTER OF OPINION.  THEY ARE ENTITLED TO IT.  They like to appear more holy when preaching in the pulpits in old English, ASSUMPTION saying King James phrases such as, “Thus saith the Lord,” instead of “Thus says the Lord,” or “Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name,” instead of “Our Father who is in heaven, Holy is Your name.” OR MAYBE THEY THINK IT IS MORE ACCURATE.  IT’S BETTER THAN PEOPLE WHO THINK THEY ARE HOLY BECAUSE THEY ARE PARSING A GREEK NOUN…Old English is not a holy language, nor is it any holier than modern English. I WOULD HAVE TO DISAGREE THERE ALTHOUGH WE COULD NEVER PROVE IT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.  MODERN ENGLISH IS DEGRADED AND FEW WOULD ARGUE THAT POINT… To believe that old English is the language of God, NOT SURE ANYONE CLAIMS THAT JUST LIKE FEW WOULD CLAIM THAT GREEK IS THE LANGUAGE OF GOD, ALTHOUGH HE DID USE GREEK NONETHELESS  one is basically worshiping the old English language as being of God. THAT IS FAULTY LOGIC, BRO.  NO ONE WORSHIPS A LANGUAGE.  STRAWMAN. God first communicated to Adam in the Garden of Eden, in the language He gave Adam at that time, then later on to Moses in Hebraic. WHAT ABOUT ARAMAIC AND GREEK?  LEFT OUT SOME INFO DIDN’T YOU? The Scriptures do not record God ever communicating with man in any form of English. THIS PROVES NOTHING.  King James Bible Only ministers communicate to their congregations in the confusing old English language in a similar manner that Catholic priests do when conducting their Catholic mass while speaking in Latin. THIS IS THE MOST ABSURD SENTENCE IN THE ARTICLE.  FIRST OFF, KING JAMES ENGLISH IS NOT OLD ENGLISH, TO CLAIM OTHERWISE IS TO MAKE YOURSELF LOOK STUPID.  LOOK UP AN EXAMPLE OF OE ON THE INTERNET AND YOU WILL SEE THAT NOT ONLY IS IT HARDER TO UNDERSTAND, IT IS ANOTHER LANGUAGE ALTOGETHER.  KING JAMES ENGLISH IS OLD FASHIONED IN AMERICA, BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS ANOTHER LANGUAGE LIKE LATIN.  POOR LUJACK IS WAY OFF BASE HERE.  The Catholic congregations are confused, and have no idea of what their priest is saying, because their priest is speaking in a language that they cannot understand.  PEOPLE KNOW WHAT I AM SAYING THE PULPIT AT ALL TIMES.  Many Catholics are deceived into believing that Latin is a holy mysterious language that their priest is using to communicate with God. Likewise, King James Bible Only preachers use an old form of English that modern English-speaking persons have difficulty understanding NOW HE IS BACKTRACKING, confusing and deceiving them into believing that old English is the holy language of God. THE KING JAMES BIBLE DOES NOT USE OLD ENGLISH.  FACT.

PSALM 12:6-7 (KJV):
The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
King James Bible Only advocates often cite and misapply Psalm 12:6-7 to uphold their doctrine that God preserved His word perfectly in the King James Bible for the English-speaking people. The words of YHWH (the Lord) WHO IS YHWH?  HE IS A PAGAN GOD AND A 19TH AND 20TH CENTURY INVENTION.  ASK THE JEWS WHAT HIS NAME IS, THEY WILL TELL YOU JEHOVAH, JUST LIKE THE KING JAMES.  were preserved in their original Hebrew [2] and Greek [3] language, THE TEXT DOESN’T SAY THAT EITHER. from the generation in which they were written, and they will be preserved forever. NOW WE HAVE A DIFFERENT ISSUE.  IF THE SCRIPTURES ARE PRESERVED IN THE GREEK AND HEBREW, THEN WHICH ONE?  LUJACK NEVER SAYS WHICH MANUSCRIPTS ARE INSPIRED, THEY DISAGREE WITH EACH OTHER IN TENS OF THOUSANDS OF PLACES.  The Scriptures have been kept, copied exactly word-for-word throughout the generations, in the Hebrew and Greek languages that they were written in, have been preserved to this day, and they will be preserved forever. POINT TO IT THEN.  HE NEVER DOES.  These verses do not in any way indicate that the words of YHWH (the Lord) were to be preserved in English, in the King James Bible only. IF LUJACK WERE TO STUDY THE ISSUE, HE WOULD SEE THAT IT POINTS TO THE KING JAMES WHEN THE TEXT SAYS, “PURIFIED SEVEN TIMES”  THERE ARE NO SEVEN PURIFICATIONS IF ONLY THE GREEK AND HEBREW ARE INSPIRED.  The King James English Bible was completed in 1611. The King James is a translation of God’s pure words. God’s actual pure words were preserved from the generation in which they were written, not since 1611. THE ISSUE IS NOT “GENERATION” IT IS “FOR EVER”  Scripture does not declare that God commanded King James of England to translate His Scriptures or that His word was to be preserved perfectly in English by God inspired translators commissioned by King James.  IT ALSO DOESN’T SAY THERE SHOULD ONLY BE 66 BOOKS IN THE BIBLE.  The King James Version is not a perfect English translation of the Scriptures, nor is there any perfect English translation. Many terms or words used in the original Scriptures are currently unknown, yet they are part of the original Scriptures. PROVE THAT THE KING JAMES TRANSLATORS DIDN’T KNOW THOSE WORDS… HE CAN’T.  Translators therefore cannot translate words that they do not know, and have often best guessed at translating them in times past. Many modern English speaking people who use a King James Bible also need to use an early modern English dictionary to understand their KJ Bible when casually reading it. NOW THE KING JAMES ISN’T OLD ENGLISH, IT IS EARLY MODERN ENGLISH.  BIG DIFFERENCE.  ALSO, THERE ARE ARCHAIC WORDS IN ANY LARGE BOOK INCLUDING THE MORNING NEWSPAPER, DOES THAT MEAN WE SHOULD DUMP THE NEWSPAPER?  The King James Bible is hardly a perfect English translation for modern day English speaking persons.  OPINION.  HE IS ARGUING FROM EMOTION WITHOUT ANY FACTS.  Although there are numerous minor errors in the King James Bible, there are no errors that are so major as to throw believers off course from God, THERE ARE IN THE MODERN VERSIONS THAT HE PROMOTES.  or cause people to lose their salvation, THERE IS A GOOD EXAMPLE, HE THINKS A CHRISTIAN CAN LOSE HIS SALVATION.  but to proclaim that the King James Bible is a 100% pure perfect word-for-word inerrant English translation is a misguided belief and false doctrine. SO DO I LOSE MY SALVATION FOR PREACHING A HERESY?  The King James Bible is a good translation, but not a perfect one.
The King James Bible was not the first bible published in English. The Geneva Bible was first published in 1560. WYCLIFFE PUBLISHED FIRST.  THEN TYNDALE… HAS HE EVEN LOOKED AT THE INFORMATION?  The King James was later released in 1611. The Geneva Bible was the first bible taken to America and was used by the Pilgrims and Puritans. IT WAS TAKEN FIRST, BUT IT WAS NEVER USED AS MUCH AS THE KJB.  Where in Scripture is it written that the King James Bible is the official God-preserved bible for the English-speaking people? UNNECESSARY BURDEN OF TRUTH.  IT IS A BIBLICAL DOCTRINE, PUTTING MUCH INFORMATION TOGETHER, MUCH LIKE THE TRINITY, WHICH LUJACK ALSO REJECTS NOT SURPRISINGLY On what basis, other than the authority of King James, do King James Bible Only advocates proclaim that only the Authorized King James Version Bible is the pure, perfect, and preserved word of God for the English-speaking people? IF YOU DON’T KNOW THE CLAIMS, WHY DON’T YOU RESEARCH IT BEFORE YOU WRITE AN ARTICLE?  ON THE FLIP SIDE, ON WHAT BASIS DOES LUJACK PROCLAIM THAT ONLY THE ORIGINAL GREEK AND HEBREW WRITINGS ARE PURE, PERFECT, AND PRESERVED?  Why the King James and not the Geneva or some other English bible translation?  IF YOU DON’T KNOW, READ VANCE’S BOOK AGAIN AND OTHER LIKE HIM.  

LEVITICUS 11:21-22 (KJV):
Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth; Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind.

The ‘beetle’ is a translation error in the King James Bible. No species of beetle has special jointed hind jumping legs to leap upon the Earth. IT DIDN’T SAY THAT, IT SAID “LEAP” Beetles are not the same kind of insects that locusts, bald locusts, and grasshoppers are. STILL INSECTS King James Bible Only defenders sometimes cite the click beetle to explain the beetle error translation. It is estimated that there are about 450,000 different types of beetles in the world. Out of all of those beetles, there are a few that can leap. The click beetle, if inverted on its back, can propel itself without using its legs to return to its feet. The click beetle uses elastic energy in its body and releases it abruptly to launch itself in the air [4]. IT SEEMS LIKE LUJACK ANSWERS HIS OWN QUESTION.  WHAT EXACTLY IS THE PROBLEM?  
The insect, mistranslated ‘beetle’ in the King James Bible, and all the related insects after its kind, are described as having special jointed hind jumping legs to leap upon the Earth.  THE TEXT DOESN’T SAY ALL THAT, IT SAYS “LEAP” Click beetles do not have these type of jumping legs. The King James insect mistranslated ‘beetle’ and ALL beetles after their kind’ do not correctly fit the description of the leaping insects of Leviticus 11:21-22. No species of beetle has special jointed hind jumping legs to leap upon the Earth with. The beetle translation error in the King James Bible was properly corrected to ‘cricket’ in the New King James Bible and is listed as cricket in most other English translated versions of Scripture.

NUMBERS 23:22 (KJV):
God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn.*
*Also: Numbers 24:8; Deuteronomy 33:17; Job 39:9-10; Psalm 22:21, 29:6, 92:10; Isaiah 34:7.
King James Bible Only defenders claim that ‘unicorn’ is not a mistranslation. IT IS OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING WE DON’T TALK ABOUT ANYMORE.  They defend the use of the term unicorn by saying that it is not the mythical horned horse-like creature, but it is instead a rhinoceros. UNICORN MEANS “ONE HORNED” THAT FITS THE INDIAN RHINOCEROS PERFECTLY.  The problem with that explanation is that it defies the very thing King James Bible Only defenders proclaim, namely that the King James Bible is the perfect translated word of God for the English-speaking people. IT CAN BE PERFECT AND HAVE A NAME FOR AN ANIMAL THAT WE DON’T USE ANYMORE IN AMERICA.  IT ISN’T WRITTEN ONLY FOR 21ST CENTURY AMERICANS.  IT’S WRITTEN TO THE WORLD.  Ask any English-speaking person what a unicorn is, even back in 1611, and the response would be that it is a mythical horned horse-like creature, not a rhinoceros. MAYBE, BUT IT SURE SEEMS LIKE AN ASSUMPTION. King James Bible Only defenders must translate unicorn to rhino to uphold their doctrine of the inerrancy of the King James Bible, because unicorn is not a proper English term for a rhino. WHY DOES IT HAVE TO BE PROPER?  HE IS REQUIRING SOMETHING THAT IS NOT NECESSARY.  AND IT ISN’T A “TRANSLATION” TO SAY THAT IT IS REFERRING TO A RHINO.  IF YOU THINK THAT, YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT A TRANSLATION IS… The unicorn translation error in the King James Bible is properly translated to an ox or wild ox in the New King James Bible and most other English translations. LUJACK IS GIVING THE MODERN VERSIONS WAY TOO MUCH GRACE, NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THAT ANIMAL IS, INCLUDING LUJACK.  There are many other, mostly minor, translation errors in the King James Bible that are far too numerous to list in this article that have been discovered and listed [5].  SORRY BUT THIS SEEMS LIKE A COP OUT… NAME THEM!
King James Bible Only advocates share a cult-like misguided faith with the Roman Catholic Church. THAT IS RIDICULOUS, CATHOLICS FOLLOW THE EVER CHANGING WHIMS OF A MAN, WE FOLLOW A BOOK THAT HASN’T CHANGED IN OVER 400 YEARS.  HOW IS THAT THE SAME?  King James Bible Only advocates proclaim that the King James Bible commissioned translators were infallible NOPE, BUT JUST LIKE PAUL AND PETER, THEY WERE FALLIBLE, BUT THEY WERE USED BY GOD TO MAKE AN INFALLIBLE BOOK.  and produced a perfectly translated English version of the Scriptures.  The Catholic Church proclaims that its popes throughout the ages have been, and are, infallible.  Infallibility and perfection are attributes of God. The original Scriptures, inspired by God, are infallible, as only God is infallible. No translation of man, or any pope or clergyman, is infallible or perfect – as all men err. WHAT ABOUT PETER AND MATTHEW AND JAMES?    King James Only advocates sometimes rhetorically ask, “If the King James Version Bible is NOT the perfect translated word of God into English, then what version is?” This is a presumptive question, like asking, “When was the last time you beat your wife?” NO, IF THE TOPIC IS BIBLE VERSIONS, IT IS LEGITIMATE TO ASK WHAT VERSION IS PERFECT.  USE YOUR HEAD LUJACK.  to a man who has never harmed his wife. Catholics, when faced with the errors of Catholic teachings, defend their church by asking the same presumptive type question, “If the Catholic Church is not the one true church, then what church is?”  THIS IS CALLED FALSE EQUIVOCATION.  THESE QUESTIONS ARE DIFFERENT BUT NEITHER ARE HARD TO ANSWER.  There is no true, pure, perfect, preserved English translation of the Holy Scriptures, HE DOESN’T EVEN HAVE A PURE GREEK OR HEBREW TEXT… just as there is no one true apostolic Christian church that the Roman Catholic Church claims to be.  The Jews are God’s chosen people who were given His perfect word. The Tanakh (Old Testament) Scriptures were written in Hebrew WHICH TEXT? MASORETIC OR LENINGRAD TEXT OR THE ALEPPO TEXT?  and the B’rit Hadashah (New Testament) Scriptures books were written in either Greek or Hebrew WHICH ONE?  SINIATICUS, VATICANUS, BYZANTINE?  DOES HE NOT KNOW THERE ARE DIFFERENCES?  , have been copied word-for-word, and have been preserved. NOT WORD FOR WORD. Imperfect translators have translated His perfect preserved word into the English language and other languages. OK?????
King James translators were neither infallible nor perfect. TRUE, LIKE THE APOSTLE JOHN, BUT WHAT THEY PRODUCED WAS INFALLIBLE AND PERFECT.  God did preserve His perfect word, but His perfect word was not perfectly translated to English for the English-speaking people by King James translators. God’s perfect word was also not perfectly translated to the Arabic, Bulgarian, Chinese THIS IS A LANGUAGE FAMILY…, Croatian, Dutch, French, German, Hungarian, Indian, NOT A LANGUAGE Japanese, Korean, Latin, Moldavian, REALLY JUST ROMANIAN, Norwegian, Polish, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Swedish, Swiss, SWISS IS NOT A LANGUAGE…Turkish, Ukrainian, Vietnamese, Welch, LIKE THE GRAPE JUICE?  HAHAHA. ALSO ALL PEOPLE IN WALES SPEAK ENGLISH. Yemeni,  ALSO CALLED “ARABIC” DUH… Zulu, or to any other written language of the world.

The King James Bible is a good, but not perfect translation of the Holy Scriptures. The King James Bible (KJV) should be used in conjunction and cross-referenced with the New King James Bible (NKJV), the Halleluyah Scriptures (HSV), the Tree of Life Scriptures (TLV) and other good versions of Scripture when searching for the truth of God’s word.  PLEASE DON’T TAKE THIS MAN’S ADVICE.  WHEN YOU USE MULTIPLE VERSIONS, YOU MAKE YOURSELF GOD, THAT IS, YOU GET TO CHOOSE WHICH ONE IS RIGHT OR WRONG.  YOU ARE NOT GOD. YOU DON’T GET TO CHOOSE WHAT IS RIGHT OR WRONG.  PRAY AND FIND OUT WHICH VERSION IS GOD’S WORD.  THEN YOU DON’T HAVE TO CHOOSE.  IF YOU’RE HONEST, YOU’LL GET YOURSELF A KING JAMES.

Notes for JWs (Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc.) for your Visitation Bible

Please see our notes on the Deity of Christ, but also add…

Jehovah’s Witnesses

Is 43:10,11 – Witnesses of Saviour. Jehovah is the only Saviour.

Phil 3:20, Titus 1:4, 2:13, 3:6, 2 Pet 1:1 – Jesus Christ is the Saviour.


Doctrines on Christ

They say Jesus WAS Michael the Archangel and NOW is again.

– Heb 13:8 – He is the same forever.

– Dan 10:5-7,12,13 – Preincarnate Christ different from Michael.

JWs don’t pray in Christ’s name.

– Acts 7:59 – Stephen prayed in his name.

– John 14:13,14 – Commanded to pray in his name.

JWs believe that Christ did not resurrect bodily.

– John 2:19-21 – Prophesied that he would.

– Luke 24:39 – Clearly stated that he did.

JWs believe that Christ was crucified on a pole not a cross.

– Matt 27:37 – Sign is over head.  It would have to be over his hands, if it was a pole.

Immortality of the Soul/ Doctrine of Hell

Eze 18:4,20 – JWs verse on soul dying

Ecc 9:4-10 – Context is a man (Solomon) who gets his ideas from nature without a Bible.

Cannot be the final truth on the afterlife.

– Lev 22:6 – Body/Soul interchangeable in OT. So Eze 18 talking about bodies dying.

– Gen 35: 17 – Here the soul leaves although the body stays. Need NT to straighten out.

– Eze 32:21 – Souls are awake/conscious in Hell.

– Luke 16:19-31 – NT revelation that Hell is real and souls go there if lost.

– Matt 25:41 – Hell is everlasting.

– Rev 14:11 – Clearly teaches an eternal Hell.

Is Germany a Christian Nation?

The following paragraph comes from this article…


“Many Germans embraced the newcomers, but others in the nation’s economically weak, culturally homogenous East feared the influx of Muslims would strike at the heart of the German identity. It was a paradox: Many feared a too-Christian attitude toward the stranger and the refugee could put into question Germany’s very identity as a Christian nation.”


The liberals at the Washington Times have come close to hitting the nail on the head for once.  The actual paradox is the term, “Christian nation”.

Might as well say a “saved lost person” or “a round square.”  Christianity and nations are not compatible, at least the Christianity of the New Testament.  We know that the Roman Catholic Church is not a New Testament Church and they have plenty of dealings with nations, aka “fornication” in Rev 17. But not any church that is following the commands of the New Testament.

There are rules in the New Testament that command our submission to government (Rom 13, 1 Pet 2) but nothing about what we are to do when WE are in government.  WHY? Because that is not the realm of Christians.  We would not be able to follow the commands of Christ and maintain a stable government in his name.  THAT is the paradox.

One time Pontius Pilate, the governor of Judea, got into a political discussion with Jesus Christ himself (We are to be “Christ”ians are we not???).  This is recorded in John 18.

Verse 36 says, “Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

We know the word, “NOW” is important because his kingdom will come in the future.  It did not come with the Protestant Reformation or the inauguration of old Trumpy.  Paul was so busy fighting with the powers that are way over the Donald’s head (Eph 6) that he had to remind his followers to not forget to pray “for them that are in authority.” (I Tim 2:2)  The prayer is not “that Christians would get involved in Politics through Capital Connections.” or that we would rebel against taxation without representation in order to set up a New Israel so that we could preach the Gospel….. blah, blah, blah…

This issue of immigration is a good litmus test for Christians to see if they are Bible Believing Christians or just “Patriots for ‘Murica” who happen to have some correct doctrine.  Here comes an illegal immigrant.  He is from a Muslim or a Communist country where the open witness of the Gospel is illegal and this law is strictly enforced.  A Christian wants that man to be saved just like God does.  Where will he have a better chance of getting saved?  America or Afghanistan or Libya?  Obviously, he has a better chance of getting saved or at least hearing the Gospel in America.  So to a Bible Believer, the choice is clear: let them come to America and open the borders.  There is no doubt, that is the Christian thing to do.

But open borders are a horrible idea for a nation, whose first job is to protect itself and it’s people.  According to the Preamble to the US Constitution, government’s job is to “form a more perfect union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”

Let us go point by point:

“Form a more perfect union” – Letting in Muslims will destroy that.

“Establish Justice” – Muslims will destroy that.

“Insure domestic Tranquillity” – Muslims will definitely destroy that.

“Provide for the common defence” – Tough to do when you might be letting in the enemy.

“Promote the general Welfare” – Tough to do when you are letting in a foreign religion that has different views on general welfare.

“Secure the blessings of liberty” – Can’t let in a people that doesn’t believe in liberty.

So we see that letting in immigrants from the Middle East en masse would be a death blow to our nation.  But as a Christian, we ought to pray that more and more of them would come to this place where they have a far greater chance of getting saved.

The question of the day is this: are you a Bible Believer or an American?  Sometimes, you can’t be both and on the issue of immigration, you cannot be both.


Baruch Spinoza

I’ve been doing some reading on the 17th Century Atheistic (or pantheistic or agnostic…) Jewish-Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza.  This man became the first philosopher after the Reformation to openly state the principles of the modern “science” of Biblical Criticism.  Many writers and historians credit Spinoza as the founder of the “science” of Biblical Criticism.  He saw that the only argument against his philosophy were applicable if the Bible was true, so he anticipated the attack, and preemptively attacked first in his book, Theological-Political Treatise.

At first glance, that would seem to give fuel to the fire of antisemitism and that this damnable “science” is an invention of the Jews.  But as is usual with history, we must read between the lines.  If we do, we are able to discern the old Whore of Babylon doing what she has always done: attack the word of God.

Spinoza was educated by former Jesuit, Franciscus van den Enden.  We must note here that “former” is a loose term when connected to the Society of Jesus.  Often times (and time and space do not permit examples here) Jesuits found it convenient to openly throw off the public profession of Jesuitism, only to keep it on behind closed doors.

Interestingly enough, when asked about God, Albert Einstein replied that, “I believe in Spinoza’s God.”  Whatever specifics he may have had in mind, Einstein explicitly states his categorical rejection of the King James Bible.  We are reminded of Proverbs 13:13: “Whoso despiseth the word shall be destroyed.”

Conspiracy Theories

In Bible Believing circles, conspiracy theories are a hot topic.

We all know Christians who have gone off the deep end and moved into the wilderness to “get off the grid” but have done nothing for the Lord in the last 20 years.  Obviously, there is a danger in going overboard on Conspiracy theories.

Nevertheless, there is SOME profit in understanding that our understanding of the last 100 years of history makes more sense when viewed through the lens of what would commonly be referred to as “Conspiracy theories.”

One of the theories that this blog has taken a tough stand against, is the idea that Bible Believers should get involved in politics in order to try and “save ‘Merica”.  Many big shot pastors and evangelists are going around this country and acting like the Bible teaches that we should try and change the direction of this country through sending Bible school graduates to DC to try and make a difference.

If one understands the truth about this country, no one would ever teach that this country CAN be saved.  “The wicked shall be cast into hell and all the nations that forget God.”  The common illustration is a man trying to bail water out of the Titanic.  Evangelists will teach that we should at least try to save the Titanic.  This illustration is faulty because if ‘Merica is the Titanic, it is not in the process of sinking.  It is at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.  Who would bail water at that point?  Maybe that’s a bad question because you might be able to find an evangelist that IS that stupid…

The way to prove that this country is sunk is 9/11.  If this country is so crooked that it would purposely stage a terror attack in order to force in the Patriot Act and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, then that country is not worth any effort trying to save it.

Our nation’s history is riddled with conspiracy theories that turned out to be true:

  1. Kuwaiti girl’s testimony that got us into the first Gulf War.
  2. Watergate.
  3. Gulf of Tonkin incident that got us into the Vietnam War.
  4. MK-ULTRA’s mind control techniques.
  5. The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.
  6. The government’s advance knowledge of the sinking of the Lusitania to start WWI.
  7. The government’s advance knowledge of the attack on Pearl Harbor to start WWI.

That is how our government works.  The ship has sunk.

I said all that to introduce the idea that all Bible Believer’s believe in some Conspiracies.  

People will argue all day about the exact definition of a Bible Believer.  But one condition that is almost without debate is that no Bible Believer believes in the Theory of Evolution.  Some proponents of the Skip Theory (no gappers) think that the Gap Fact is a compromise, but even the most extreme believer in the Gap believes that Darwinian Evolution is a fact.

Bible Believers are forced to admit that there is a CONSPIRACY and that all the scientists of the world are working together under the auspices of the Devil in order to teach kids that men descend from monkeys.  This conspiracy’s ultimate goal (or the purveyors of this conspiracy’s goal) is to teach men that all existence is an accident and that nothing exists after death.  There is no soul because souls don’t fit into the evolutionary paradigm.  In their most open dialogue, the high priests of the religion of evolution will teach that since death is as natural as life, then there may come a time when killing men by the millions is as expedient as killing the wolves in Yellowstone or the Tasmanian Tigers.  This will culminate in the religion of the Antichrist and the deaths of so many that the Antichrist will make Hitler, Stalin, and Mao look like little kiddies.

All Bible Believers accept this conspiracy.

Another conspiracy that a Bible Believer holds to, is the conspiracy about modern Bible versions.   How in the world, modern scholars have duped the world into thinking that the Alexandrian-text type that represents less that 5% of available manuscripts represents the God honoured originals can only be labelled as a conspiracy.

Researchers Chris Pinto, David Daniels of Chick Publications, and Steven Avery are beginning to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Codex Siniaticus (Aleph) is a 19th Century forgery stolen by Tischendorf and lyingly presented as written in the 4th Century.  We now are forced to admit that modern scholarship is as corrupt on Bible manuscripts as it is on Evolution.  To believe contrary to the modern paradigm is to be a conspiracy theorist.  It shouldn’t bother a Bible Believer at all.

So knowing that all Bible Believers believe in some form of Conspiracy Theory, we shouldn’t be so averse to the idea that 9/11 was an inside job and that the devil rules the world through the Pope and the Pope through the Jesuits and the UN all the way down to the great puppets Obama and ole’ Trump.  We shouldn’t reject ideas like Geocentricity out of hand, but we should ask ourselves the only question that really matters, “What saith the Scripture?”

This should make you want to stay out of politics and science and move closer to the Lord Jesus Christ in desiring and praying for his soon return.


Erasmus of Rotterdam



Here is a link to Bro. Bob Alexander’s website.  Specifically this link points to a series of mp3s that have to do with the topic of the King James Bible Controversy.


Obviously, I recommend the audio of Dr. Peter Ruckman.  But I also heartily recommend that you give a listen to the audio by BV Barlett about Erasmus of Rotterdam.


I fully believe that, along with the King James Translators, Erasmus is the fulfillment of Matt 23:34:

“Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:”

After listening, I think you will agree.

Visitation Notes for Dealing with Jews


Isaiah 52:13-53:12

  1. Isaiah 49:5,6 – Servant can’t be Israel, it’s the Messiah.
    1. Therefore, the “servant” in Isaiah isn’t always Israel. (also 20:3, 22:20, 37:35)
  2. Why can’t Isaiah 53 be the nation of Israel?
    1. Vs 3 – Nations hid from Israel? When?
    2. Vs 7 – Israel didn’t open mouth?
      1. Yes, they did. Ex “Trial of God”
    3. Vs 8 – Cut off out of the land of the living?
      1. Many nations have ceased, but Israel still exists.
    4. Vs 9 – No violence?
      1. King David hotel bombing, wars of Israel…
    5. No deceit in mouth?
      1. Hebrew calendar manipulated so Christ not born at year 4000.

Ps 22 – Prophecy of Crucifixion.

  • Can’t be David. Vs 14, 16, 18.

Dan 9:20-27 – 69 weeks (483 years) started in Neh 2

  • Artaxerxes started his reign in 473 BC.
  • His 20th year would be 453 BC.
  • 453-483=30 AD
  • The Messiah (9:25) had to come around the time of Jesus Christ. (30 AD)
  • Doesn’t allow for the Messiah in 2015 AD or later…

New Jerusalem Road

  1. All Have Sinned – Ecc 7:20, 2 Chron 6:36, Jer 17:9
  2. Consequences For Sin – Is 59:2, 64:6, Eze 18:4, Ps 9:17
  3. Shedding Of Blood For Atonement – Lev 17:11, Is 53
  4. Resurrection – Ps 16:10 (David saw corruption)
  5. You Must Trust Him – Ps 2:10,11
  6. You Must Trust Him Now – Is 55:1-6